Public Hearing: Downtown Parking Requirements and Public Zone Amendments

Hello Langley,

The Planning Advisory Board will be holding a public hearing on February 13, 2012 at 3pm in city hall to consider amendments to the Langley Municipal Code relevant to the off-street parking requirements in the Central Business Zone and the range of uses allow for publicly zoned properties that are otherwise in the downtown.

Downtown Parking Requirements

The existing off-street parking requirements in the downtown are costly, unnecessary and serve as an impediment to the type of development that is in keeping with the historical development pattern in the downtown characterized by small scale commercial and mixed-use development with NO on-site parking.  For new development property and business owners must either provide parking on-site, have an off-site parking agreement or pay the city $5,000 per required parking space.  Communities and smart growth advocates around the country are recognizing the detrimental effects of high on-site parking requirements and are increasingly moving away from minimum parking requirements and instead looking to create incentives to support compact, walkable communities with a district wide approach to parking much like we have in Langley today.

Langley, like many small scale urban downtowns, has the perception of a parking problem that isn’t supported by the facts.  In a parking study conducted in the summer of 2011, including an inventory of approximately 550 parking spaces (including public and private lots) within the downtown area, it was shown that the peak occupancy for parking demand was 67% (even during the Second Street Market) leaving approximately 180 parking spaces available even during peak time.  However, an active parking management plan is needed to more efficiently use the existing parking in the downtown.  To find a parking space during peak occupancy may require walking a block or two to your destination, but that doesn’t signify a parking problem.

Here are a few graph that highlight the results of the parking study.  The Districts are:

District 1:  Third Street and upper Anthes

District 2:  Second Street

District 3:  First Street

I worked for six years as the Planning Director in a small scale downtown with many similar qualities as in Langley where we had no on-site parking requirement because of the availability of public parking and shared parking agreements between businesses.  My experience taught me that this type of parking system works well and maximizes the existing parking resources while minimizing the development of unnecessary new parking facilities that have negative environmental impacts.

Specifically, the proposal being considered by the PAB includes:

 Eliminate the on-site parking requirement for the first 5,000 square feet per individual business/land use

 Allow off-site joint parking agreements within 1/8 of a mile for all development projects

 Allow for the Planning Official or Hearings Examiner to waive the on-site parking requirements

 Eliminate the fee in lieu of parking requirement (currently $5000 per space)

 Allow for further reductions in parking requirements based on a shared use analysis

Public Zone Amendments
Properties otherwise in the CB Zone (downtown) that have a public use such as the post office or city hall are zoned differently from the rest of the downtown area.  This creates an issue with the introduction of new land uses when a public use is not longer viable as was the case when the firehouse on Second Street transitioned from a public to a commercial use.  There is no need for these properties to have a distinct zoning designation, but rather public uses should be one of the uses allowed in the CB Zone and allowed throughout the district.  The ultimate solution is to amend the rezone these properties form P-1 to CB, but that will require a comprehensive plan amendment that we are not prepared to proceed with until at the earliest late in 2012.  So, the current proposal is an interim solution whereby an overlay zone for these properties will allow for commercial uses.

For detailed information on the proposals from the city’s website click here

We of course would like any comments or feedback you may have on this proposal so don’t hesitate to fill out the form below, which is sent directly to me, or attend the public hearing on Monday.

 

Public Hearing: Planning Advisory Board – November 14, 2011

The Planning Advisory Board (PAB) will be holding a public hearing on November 14, 2011 at 3pm in City Hall to discuss several amendments to the zoning and development regulations.

Development regulations often work in two distinct and fundamental ways.  At their best, development regulations guide development and design to suit the goals and desires of the community.  Effective development regulations may incentivize or require such things as green design, pedestrian oriented development, infill development and quality urban design.  At their worst, development regulations can actually prohibit the type of development that a community may desire.  Often developed long ago during a different time period based on a false set of assumptions many zoning and development ordinances today actually restrict the type of development that may define the character of the community.  Strict on-site parking requirements for example would prohibit the type of development along First Street or require high fees for off-site parking that may not be financially feasible for the property owner.  Langley’s existing development regulations are widely agreed to be outdated and in many cases regressive.  A larger scale effort to rewrite the code to fully implement the comprehensive plan is forthcoming, but due to other planning priorities will not likely occur for at least a year.  In the meantime the following amendments are intended to be a small step towards implementing many of the goals of the comprehensive plan and the Growth Management Act by removing barriers to affordable housing and innovative development along with promoting energy conservation and the inclusion of public space in private development projects.  Broadly, the amendments address several important goals of the comprehensive plan including support for infill development, affordable housing, public space and green design.

The proposals include incentives for affordable housing and innovative mixed- use development, incentives for public space, charging stations for electric vehicles, greater flexibility for the development and design of detached accessory dwelling units and the protection of trees during construction.  See below for details on each proposal and links to the proposed amendments.  To comment use the form at the end of this post.

Affordable Housing

In order to promote affordable housing the ordinance, through a community based process, allows for flexibility in the development regulations in exchange for public benefits such as perpetually affordable affordable housing, public space and energy efficiency.  These demonstration projects will likely inform a future rewrite of the city’s development regulations.  To review the proposal click here:   Affordable Housing Proposal

Mixed-Use Development

Applicable in the Central Business District the proposal allows flexibility in the development regulations to allow for innovative mixed use projects that incorporate housing, commercial, public space and green design.  The ordinance is a pilot program and expires after two years, but may be extended.  To review the proposal click here:  Mixed-Use Housing

Wharf Street Overlay Height Modification

Another proposed amendment allows for building height modificatiosn in the Wharf Street Overly District.  Under the proposal a partial fourth story may be allowed in exchange for indoor and outdoor public and semi-public space.  To review the proposal click here:  Wharf Street Overlay Height Modification

Accessory Dwelling Units

Accessory dwelling units are small residential units associated with a detached single family residence.  The revisions to the standards for ADU’s allows for increased flexibility on the height of detached ADU’s up to 22′ and the maximum size of ADU’s is increased from 800′ to 1000′ gross square feet.  To review the proposal click here:  Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

State law requires the city to allow battery charging stations or electric vehicle charging stations in most of the zoning districts.  The new ordinance will allow electric vehicle charging stations in most of the city’s zoning districts.  The law is intended to promote the use of electric vehicles to reduce fossil fuel use.  To review the proposal click here:  Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

Tree Protection During Construction

For certain development projects where trees are being retained a plan to protect the trees during construction is a required part of the permit application and approval.  To review the proposal click here:  Tree Protection During Construction

Use the form below to provide comments on the above proposals:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers